Fellow humans
EUROGENDFOR ( http://www.eurogendfor.eu ) is the name designated to the EU police/military force. This organisation has been set up by 5 states within the EU (FR,SP.IT,NETH,PORT). This Force will be supplied by units from EU member states and will undertake “polimilitary” (my word for militarised police) actions at the bequest of CIMIN (defined as the “High level interdepartmental committee”) made up of both civilian and military members. CIMIN, we are told, will designate strategy and tactics on a case by case basis for deployment. The EGF will be placed at the disposal of the EU, UN, OSCE, NATO or any other international organisation or ad hoc coalition.
The EGF will be able to accommodate the full spectrum of polimilitary functions
1. Security and public order
2 Monitoring, advising, coaching and supervising local police forces including criminal investigation
3. Public surveillance, border monitoring, traffic control and general intelligence
4. Criminal investigation, tracking, arrest and transfer of suspects to the appropriate judiciary
5. Protecting population, property and infrastructure during public disturbances
6. Training police officers to international standards
7. Training instructors through mutual co-operation.
In addition to the above, EGF is permitted to transport and retain weapons and ammunition, tactical equipment, vehicles, other weapons systems (presumably crowd control types of the “non lethal” variety) and explosives. These are to be used in accordance with the agreement of tactical deployment between CIMIN and the requesting state.
In 2005 the first exercises were held St Astier France followed by company sized deployment in Valdemoro Spain in 2006. The gist of their mission is to fill the hole between military combat and the post combat period, returning the state to normality and peace.
This all sounds just peachy, doesn’t it? No it does not.
Firstly, a police force cannot be military in nature. If this occurs, force will dictate over reason every time. Force will crush disagreement and will be used as an oppressive tool. Perhaps a specific state may have internal strife between the government and the people. A disagreement, perhaps, about legislation. The government can request the use of the EGF and use its force to crush internal dissent. This does not add up to democratic principle.
Secondly, the wide scope of organisations that may request the use of the EGF reduces the EGF to the role of mercenaries for hire, hired through monies raised by the EU by contributing member states. Does this mean that the WHO could use the force to apply vaccinations by force? Does this also mean that the EGF could be deployed to appropriate the EU taxes from resisting citizens? Does this mean that a state that resists inclusion into an EU treaty can be smashed into compliance in the future?
Thirdly, the training of local policing forces to “international standards” means that military training becomes part and parcel of the package. As I have already stated in previous articles, militarised police are a danger to everyone.
Lastly, and probably more importantly, The EGF, the proposed EU intelligence organisation and the EU army will constitute parts of a supranational state infrastructure. Sooner or later this regional state will begin to operate as a sovereign entity and force its agenda (as always) on others. Just as the government of a state overides a local council decision
The legendary Alex Jones has covered this centralising and militarising of “peace forces” in his Police state videos raising these uncomfortable truths. The prospects of armoured “police” kicking down your door and shouting instructions at you, while conducting exercises designed to familiarise you with polimilitary units on your streets, are sure to be in the pipeline.
We have already seen the results of international polimilitary engagements worldwide. The abuses connected with UN peacekeepers are legion, as are the examples of failed missions. ABC reported, in Feb. 10, 2005 “The range of sexual abuse includes reported rapes of young Congolese girls by UN troops; an Internet paedophile ring run from Congo by Didier Bourguet, a senior UN official from France; a colonel from South Africa accused of molesting his teenage male translators; and estimates of hundreds of underage girls having babies fathered by UN soldiers who have been able to simply leave their children and their crimes behind.”
The official reply, also quoted in the same article( http://abcnews.go.com/2020/UnitedNations/story?id=489306&page=1 )
“William Swing, a former U.S. ambassador to Congo who now heads the UN peacekeeping mission there, admitted the sexual crimes were a black mark on the United Nations. "It pains us all," he said. "It's absolutely odious. And we're determined to wipe it out." But Swing said the problem was just recently brought to his attention, and that only a small percentage of the 11,000 UN personnel in Congo were involved.
"A few people have managed to basically cause disgrace for the mission and for the UN, and that's why we're determined to conquer it. I have sent a dozen home,"
A dozen sent home?? No convictions?? What about the trauma, the pregnancies and the suffering of these vulnerable people? No prosecution and no accountability is endemic of this type of farce. Why would you expect things to change with the EGF?
One thing is for sure… This is being constructed for your “safety”. The NWO, after all, loves its obedient servants. We better take steps to prevent these forces entering our borders. We better start paying attention to EU legislation and find out just what we are being committed to. In the end, we are the ones who will suffer.
Yours in Humanhood
Antireptilian
lwtc247
Well written post as usual Antireptilian.
Your article describes the implications of the militarization of the police in Europe. We already have this in the UK. The US is the spearhead of this, as such the UK doesn’t need EGF. Europe is slower in militaristic/enforcement part of fascism but seems quite strong in its mental fascism. Whereas in the UK, the mental fascism is significantly weaker than the EU. But, both UK and Europe are making up on their deficiencies. In Europe with the EGF, and in the UK, the prompting of synthetic debate of 'hatred' laws and 'holocaust questioning'.
And of course, UK and Europe fascism will end up being identical, simply having been achieved from different directions.
Alex Jones (and team) have done a superb job at exposing this particularly in the US, but people don't give it much attention. Instead they are fixated with the 9-11, Oklahoma and so on, which of course are important, but not the whole picture. The apathy towards the militarization of the police in the US is going to cost USans very dearly. Perhaps when there huddled in the multiple concentration camps (reportedly built across the country) then they'll realise their error. Those left behind will feel lucky and prod themselves periodically not to forget to Zeig Heil their supreme leader least they befall a similar internment.
As mentioned, the UK Govt already uses your superbly coined 'polimitary' to crush dissent. The minors strike, the poll tax demo (remember that sod of a policeman who charged into the crowd on his horse and rammed into that woman?), anti-globalisation protests, an innocent Brazilian slaughtered because the day before some people had the lethal combination of chapatti flour, tupparware containers and effectively, 'party poppers'. All that's happened really is that the appearance of firearms has become more casual. {You did well to briefly touch reference what seems like a process of 'desensitisation/submission'}
And of course, all this happens because the police force is already politicised. A polimilitary is likely to strongly deter display of discontent and to be able to put it down a lot quicker if such a display actually materialize - Especially after the bastards killed some demonstrators, as I have absolutely no hesitation in assuming they would do.
Although having said all that, it is possible that the tighter the fascist regime gets (and fascism has evident) then the more the people may resist it, but this would only happen once people correctly come to realise the problem so expect to see more sex/money/scandal based 'entertainment' media programming to stop their brains from switching on.
The British police are already paramilitary but their weapons branch isn't merged fully into all on the street divisions. The call for an openly armed police force has been called for, from observation, politicians and disproportionately to a higher degree than police themselves because the politicians of course realise with an armed police they will be able to exercise a greater level of totalitarianism, but in their minds of course, they will con themselves into thinking it is for greater 'freedom'.
I would be shocked if an appointed policeman with ultimate responsibility for the use of firearms EVER would be operating on a basis which the government took exception to i.e. a highly cautions softly-softly approach to the use of lethal force.
It would be great to think there was a 5th column emerged within this force which would destroy it from within and restore the low level and friendly type of policing that is needed in a harmonious society. But its incredibly unlikely to happen.
Last thing for now... You mentioned the US sex abuse in Africa. I remember writing about this because I was outraged at how the BBC 'reported' this story which was heavily skewed to excusing the abusers saying - paraphrase: The girls deliberately flirted and they were prostitutes as they wanted material reward for their actions. It was appalling. Black girls, so obviously slags (in the Beeb's eyes that is) don't get raped you see they just pick on lonely soldiers). And the Japanese Okinawa girls, obviously ghehsa gooks (in the eyes of USan soldiers that is) love nothing better than forceful penile penetration on a car in public places. Bastards.